Historical development of organizational behavior

This shift of focus in the study of organisations was called the Hawthorne Effect. This was done deliberately by the group to protect the slow workers and because of the apprehension that if the pace of production were increased, a sizeable number of the workforce would eventually be redundant.

Raymond Mills states that the human relation approach was simply to "treat people as human beings instead of machines in the productive processacknowledge their needs to belong and to feel important by listening to and heeding their Historical development of organizational behavior where possible and by involving them in certain decisions concerning working conditions and other matters, then morale would surely improve and workers would cooperate with management in achieving good production".

This does not necessarily mean that an understanding of human relations is not useful; it may have a pay off in areas other than performance, such as absenteeism, turnover etc. The investigators then started to reduce the illumination for the test group.

However, when the industrial revolution began to mature and become stabilized, this approach was no longer appropriate. They are concerned with the ways in which the goals of individuals and those of the organization can be made to fuse, or at least coincide to some extent.

The influence of the human relations philosophy can be seen in many management training programmes today. Classical school expressed the belief that, if these steps are followed, the organization will function harmoniously and effectively.

The two continued their studies aimed at eliminating unnecessary motions and expanded their interests to exploring ways of reducing task fatigue. No slacking, bending of rules. The basic tenet of contingency theory can be put essentially as follows: He also devised a unique pay incentive system that not only paid workers extra for reaching standard in the allotted time but also awarded bonuses to supervisors when workers reached standard.

The results in the bank wiring room were essentially opposite to those in the relay room. Thus, it was Fredrick Winslow Taylor who introduced the systematic use of goal setting and rewards to motivate employees that could be considered as the starting of the academic discipline of Organisational Behaviour.

Often participants are taught that improved communications, etc. With this epoch making study the focus of organisational studies shifted to analysis of how human factors and psychology affected organisations. Divide work and responsibility so that management is responsible for planning work methods using scientific principles and workers are responsible for executing the work accordingly.

Ahundred years earlier, Adam Smith had carefully pointed out the advantages of division of labour and inCharles Babbage, a British mathematician with some asto unding managerial insights, discussed transference of skill in his book Economy of Machinery and Manufacture.

One hundred years later, German Sociologist Max Weber introduced the concept about rational organisations and initiated the concept of charismatic leadership. The tasks The people The environment In other word Manager should consider situation. They possessed the managerial qualities necessary for the initial stages if industrialization.

Logically, at some high level of illumination productivity should begin to decline, so the original experiment was designed to determine the optimal level of illumination. Frank also designed special scaffolding for different types of jobs and devised precise directions for mortar consistency.

Further research indicated that the lack of a predictable relationship between lighting and output was related to the mental and emotional side of organisations rather than the physical, mechanistic side recognized by scientific management.

Before the Hawthorne studies officially started, Elton Mayo headed a research team, which was investigating the causes of very high turnover in the mule-spinning department of a Philadelphia textile mill in and As had been expected, the productivity went up in the latter or what was known as the experimental group.

Others in the movement, such as Frank and Lillian Gilberth and Henry L Gantt made especially significant contributions.


There needed to be a clear division of work responsibilities. But Rensis Likert has christened a special approach as motivational approach. Therbligs included such motions as select, position, and hold - motions that were used to study tasks in a number of industries.

Surprisingly, here also the researchers found that the production of the group had no relation with the working conditions. The output was actually restricted by the bank wirers.

Organisational Behaviour Historical Development and Contributing Disciplines to OB Field

Lillian Gilbreth ranks as the first woman to gain prominence as a major contributor to the development of management as a science. It was found that the group evolved its own production norms which were definitely much lower than that set by the authority. So the company sought help from the Historical development of organizational behavior of university professors to find a solution to the problem.

Prior to this many of the large organisations that did exist, were military ones in which the authority of the leader was supreme and practically unquestioned, since membership was not voluntary.

How much authority should be given to the incumbent of each position? It will arrange for an organization in which all roles are exactly dovetailed.

Henry L Gantt In strong contrast to the impersonality that characterized the classical approach, the Hawthorne studies pointed to the impact that social aspects of the job had on productivity, particularly the effect of personal attention from supervisors and relationship among group members.

As an industrial engineer, he was concerned within efficiencies in manual labour jobs and believed that by scientifically studying the specific motions that made up the total job, a more rational, objective and effective method of performing the job could be determined.

Cooperate fully with workers to ensure that they use the proper method. The group norm was so strictly adhered to by most of the group members that nobody dared to violate it for the fear of being ostracized by the group.

Seldom do we have to apply the same principles twice in identical conditions.Historical Development Of Organizational Behavior.

1. Definition of Organizational Behavior * As stated by Keith Davis, organizational behavior is the study and application of knowledge about how people act within an organization.

2. Historical Development of Organizational Behavior 3. Contributions of the following: • Robert. [ Organisational Behaviour Historical Development ] Looking back on scientific management as an approach, Hicks writes: [ Organisational Behaviour Historical Development ] By the end of the scientific management period, the worker had been reduced to the role of an impersonal cog in the machine of production‘.

The most important development in the history of organizational science is the discovery by Elliott Jaques that organizational hierarchy mirrors adult cognitive development and that, as a consequence of this, one can formulate and explain a behavioral typology based on work level that applies to all organizations, regardless of.

Historical Development of Organisational Behaviour. Organizational behavior is a field of study that investigates the impact that individuals, groups and structures have on behavior within an organization. Those accusations notwithstanding, OB can play a major role in organizational development and success.

The goal of the organizational theorist is to revitalize organizational theory and develop a better conceptualization of organizational life.

This paper explored the historical foundations of organizational studies, finding that organizations have significantly influenced the development of human history by providing people a means to coordinate activities toward achieving a purpose.

Historical development of organizational behavior
Rated 3/5 based on 26 review